For enhanced safety, the front and rear seat shoulder belts of the Honda CR-V have pretensioners to tighten the seatbelts and eliminate dangerous slack in the event of a collision. The Kia Seltos doesn’t offer pretensioners for its rear seat belts.
The Honda CR-V has standard driver and front passenger side knee airbags mounted low on the dashboard. These airbags help prevent the driver and front passenger from sliding under their seatbelts or the main frontal airbags; this keeps them better positioned during a collision for maximum protection. Knee airbags also help keep the legs from striking the dashboard, preventing knee and leg injuries in the case of a serious frontal collision. The Seltos doesn’t offer knee airbags.
Using vehicle speed sensors and seat sensors, smart airbags in the CR-V deploy with different levels of force or don’t deploy at all to help better protect passengers of all sizes in different collisions. The CR-V’s side airbags will shut off if a child is leaning against the door. The Seltos’ side airbags don’t have smart features and will always deploy full force.
In a Vehicle-to-Vehicle Frontal Crash Prevention 2.0 test conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), the Honda CR-V achieved an “Acceptable” rating for its forward collision warning and automatic braking systems, outperforming the Kia Seltos which scored “Poor” - the lowest rating - in these critical safety features.
The CR-V EX-L/Sport L/Sport Touring has standard Parking Sensors to help warn the driver about vehicles, pedestrians or other obstacles behind or in front of their vehicle. The Seltos doesn’t offer a front parking aid.
Both the CR-V and the Seltos have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, side-impact head airbags, front wheel drive, height adjustable front shoulder belts, plastic fuel tanks, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, lane departure warning systems, rearview cameras, driver alert monitors, available all wheel drive, blind spot warning systems and rear cross-path warning.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Honda CR-V is safer than the Kia Seltos:
|
CR-V |
Seltos |
|
Driver |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
Neck Injury Risk |
17.1% |
22.2% |
Neck Stress |
181 lbs. |
242 lbs. |
Neck Compression |
48 lbs. |
52 lbs. |
Leg Forces (l/r) |
217/317 lbs. |
371/423 lbs. |
|
Passenger |
|
STARS |
4 Stars |
4 Stars |
Chest Compression |
.5 inches |
.5 inches |
Neck Stress |
211 lbs. |
239 lbs. |
Neck Compression |
37 lbs. |
135 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH and into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Honda CR-V is safer than the Kia Seltos:
|
CR-V |
Seltos |
|
Front Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
72 |
79 |
Chest Movement |
.8 inches |
1 inches |
Abdominal Force |
115 lbs. |
167 lbs. |
|
Rear Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
71 |
177 |
Spine Acceleration |
51 G’s |
63 G’s |
|
Into Pole |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
Max Damage Depth |
12 inches |
12 inches |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
Side impacts caused 23% of all road fatalities in 2018, down from 29% in 2003, when the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety introduced its side barrier test. In order to continue improving vehicle safety, the IIHS has started using a more severe side impact test: 37 MPH (up from 31 MPH), with a 4180-pound barrier (up from 3300 pounds). The results of this newly developed test demonstrates that the Honda CR-V is much safer than the Seltos:
|
CR-V |
Seltos |
Overall Evaluation |
GOOD |
MARGINAL |
Structure |
GOOD |
MARGINAL |
|
Driver Injury Measures |
|
Head/Neck |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Head Injury Criterion |
138 |
234 |
Neck Tension |
178 lbs. |
268 lbs. |
Neck Compression |
45 lbs. |
67 lbs. |
Torso |
ACCEPTABLE |
ACCEPTABLE |
Shoulder Deflection |
.91 in |
1.42 in |
Shoulder Force |
201 lbs. |
290 lbs. |
Torso Deflection Rate |
7 MPH |
8 MPH |
Pelvis |
ACCEPTABLE |
POOR |
Pelvis Force |
1093 lbs. |
1383 lbs. |
Head Protection |
GOOD |
GOOD |
|
Passenger Injury Measures |
|
Head/Neck |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Head Injury Criterion |
119 |
258 |
Neck Tension |
45 lbs. |
112 lbs. |
Neck Compression |
89 lbs. |
201 lbs. |
Torso |
GOOD |
MARGINAL |
Shoulder Deflection |
.94 in |
2.17 in |
Shoulder Force |
223 lbs. |
335 lbs. |
Torso Max Deflection |
1.06 in |
2.01 in |
Torso Deflection Rate |
7 MPH |
14 MPH |
Pelvis |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Head Protection |
GOOD |
GOOD |